An AI governance stand-up instrument for mission-driven institutions
The model is not the mission. This instrument establishes who reviews, who may ground, and what the institution can prove before the regulator, the accreditor, or the algorithm asks. Twenty items, five domains, one cabinet session. Every rating below Codified generates a ninety-day move.
Five-domain architecture translated from Dario Amodei, “Policy on the AI Exponential” (June 2026). The translation to higher education is interpretive; the essay does not address the sector.
Ratings and the charter draft are computed and saved only in this browser, on this device. Nothing is transmitted; a cabinet’s self-assessment stays in the room.
Ink density is maturity: the bar fills as governance moves from luck to record. 0 of 20 items rated.
Drawn from every item rated Exposed, then Reactive. Capped at eight: governance that lists everything schedules nothing.
A stand-up draft assembled from the ratings: authority, composition, scope, the docket, evidence discipline, and a planned-abandonment clause. Paste it into the board packet and mark it draft.